The 24-70 is obviously a fantastic lens, but maybe overkill unless you need 2.8 - if not, a lighter lens with more zoom is maybe the best way to go - the 70-120mm range really changes the kind of compositions you can get (and allows some semi-macro shots too). 2. pk_ • 1 yr. ago. This firmware update is for lenses equipped with firmware versions older than RF24-105mm F4 L IS USM Firmware Version 2.0.1, RF24-70mm F2.8 L IS USM Firmware Version 1.0.4 and RF70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Firmware Version 1.0.5. If the lens’s firmware is already latest version, it is not necessary to update the firmware. That said, our prior Canon mainstay was the Rebel T2i paired with the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 ART which is only lighter by 50g than the EOS RP paired with the RF 24-70 f/2.8, and the FF-equivalent DOF is very close (~f/2.9) as well. We also had two fewer kids to chase around then though
Best 70-200mm f/2.8 Lenses Compared. Canon 24-105/4. L IS II. Canon 24-105. f/4 IS. Canon 24-105mm STM. Sony 24-105mm f/4.
It has the IS of the 24-105 and the 24-70 f/4 lenses and the f/2.8 aperture of the 24-70 len in one package, and its focal length range is ideal for many cropped sensor shooters, extending from what might be termed “normal wide” to “portrait length” short telephoto. The lenses in this article are available from site sponsor B&H Photo: Has a metal mount. Canon EF 70-200mm F/2.8L USM. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM. A metal mount is generally superior to a plastic mount as it is more durable. weight. 1.31kg. 780g. We consider a lower weight better because lighter devices are more comfortable to carry.
🎵 Get Royalty Free Music (30 days free!):
When it comes to a walkaround lens, you generally have two options: a 24-70mm f/2.8 or a 24-105mm f/4 (or something similar). So, which is right for you? Both options have advantages and
However, the 24-70mm has a bigger maximum aperture at f/2.4, while the 24-105mm is only at f/4. When to Use the Canon 24-70mm. You can use the Canon EF 24-70 in various photography niches, including portrait, travel, event, and real estate photography. The wide aperture values allow capturing the best available light for well-lit interiors and 24-105L is very near performance of RF 24-70, corners are tiny bit sharper on wide-end on 24-70, but i prefer 24-105 otherwise, had both to test out, the bokeh wasnt so much diffrient 2.8 vs 4 (also 105mm @ f4 separates more than 70mm @ 2.8) 24-105 is lighter, doesnt make camera front heavy and uses 77mm vs 82mm on 24-70. Make.
The 24-70 is an architecture/landscape and indoor event lens. The 24-105 is a street photography and outdoor event lens. Both are excellent, but both are full-frame lenses that will be annoyingly long on an 80D. For your purposes, take Scott's advice and get the 17-55 f/2.8.
The 24-105mm is a relative bargain at $1,150, since you will pay almost twice as much for the 24 -70mm f/2.8. The price of the 24-105mm becomes even better if you buy it along with a camera, as it is the “kit lens” for some high-end Canon cameras. The Importance of Lens Diameter

The Canon 17-35mm f/2.8 L (1995-2001) is Canon's lightest f/2.8 ultrawide zoom ever, has a metal filter thread and great ergonomics with instant manual-focus override and a great focal length range. Its optics are about as good as the Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 (2001-2007).

In dim light an f/2.8 lens will have a faster and more accurate AF than an f/4 lens would. While you may never shoot it at f/2.8 -- that's what it's going to use to focus. The lens isn't stopped down to your shooting aperture when acquiring or focusing on your subject, it does all that wide-open. XqbrEO.
  • hamkutq3u2.pages.dev/145
  • hamkutq3u2.pages.dev/342
  • hamkutq3u2.pages.dev/94
  • hamkutq3u2.pages.dev/74
  • hamkutq3u2.pages.dev/279
  • hamkutq3u2.pages.dev/276
  • hamkutq3u2.pages.dev/343
  • hamkutq3u2.pages.dev/106

    • canon 24 70 f4 vs f2 8